————————————————

Our Continual Improvement Process


Overview

Our commitment to excellence and to continual improvement began in 1975 with the company's founding by two DuPont chemical engineers. Our Continual Improvement Process (CIP) is ongoing and is heavily influenced by the philosophy and teachings of Dr. W. Edwards Deming.

We subscribe to each of Dr. Deming's 14 points. We continue to seek ways to consistently apply the concepts of those 14 points in our day-to-day activities in the company.

We believe in statistical thinking and in the importance of understanding variation. We believe in the concepts of common causes (normal: from the system) as opposed to special causes (abnormal: not from the system).

We believe in optimization of entire systems. We believe that it is wasteful and counterproductive to suboptimize which often results from (1) too narrow- and/or too short-range a focus on individual system components, sometimes called fragmented myopia, or (2) the well-meaning, but harmful, introduction and endorsement of competitive driving forces within an organization.

We believe in root-cause analyses, system improvements, and reliability rather than inspection or the pursuit of scapegoats.

We believe in partnerships, cooperation, and teamwork.

We believe in seamless interfaces between our customers and us, our alliance partners and us, and our suppliers and us.

We believe in striving for true win-win situations.

We believe in a focus on the long term, balanced with a practical recognition of near-term needs and constraints.

We believe in the importance of understanding and dealing with tradeoffs, contradictions, and dynamic complexity.


People

The heart of our CIP is our people (associates). Over the first 24 years of the company's existence, a high priority and an intense focus have been placed on finding, recruiting, selecting, training, encouraging, empowering, and retaining outstanding people. We have been very successful in these efforts, and we have found that this process builds upon itself. Outstanding people are usually willing and able to help find and recruit others of high competence and high character to become team members.

We believe in the philosophy and teachings of Dr. Stephen Covey and in his concepts of the Seven Habits of Highly Effective People and Principle-Centered Leadership.

We believe in a flat, highly interactive, interdependent organization and in the empowerment and trust of all of our people (associates).

We believe in the philosophy and teachings of Robert Greenleaf and Max DuPree with regard to their concepts of Servant Leadership.

Our CIP is heavily focused and dependent on (1) our belief in the importance of strong, positive interpersonal relationships which are based on trust, and (2) our belief that trust is ultimately based on consistently demonstrated trustworthiness.


Structure

Our CIP is facilitated and strengthened by the company's organizational structure, which is very flat. That flat structure enhances flexibility, interactivity, innovation, empowerment, teamwork, responsiveness, effectiveness, intrinsic motivation, and true value. Our evolving organizational structure includes two primary organizational elements: (1) external services and (2) internal services. We have three corporate leaders, two of whom focus primarily on external services issues and one of whom focuses primarily on internal services issues.

Within each of our two organizational elements (external services and internal services) are groups. Each group is led by a senior leader. Titles such as director, officer, manager, and supervisor are not used within our company. Instead, we have corporate leaders, senior leaders, and associates.

Any associate in any group may serve at any time in a lead role on a particular project or task. Groups and group members often work jointly on projects and tasks. Strong emphasis is placed on cooperation, teamwork, constancy of purpose, and systemic thinking, and optimization of the whole. Competition between organizational elements, between groups, or between individuals is strongly discouraged. Competitive thinking and competitive behavior are viewed as suboptimal, myopic, counterproductive, and totally out of alignment with our CIP.


Learning

In 1990, a new phase of our evolving continual improvement process began. In 1990, a series of leadership conferences was begun. By the end of that year, every person who was then employed by our company had attended one of those conferences. The conferences centered on the theme In Pursuit of Excellence and focused on our Standards and Values.

During those conferences, it was emphasized that opportunities (as well as needs) for leadership exist at all times, at all levels, in all parts of the organization, and for all associates, no matter how long they may have been with the company. And it was emphasized that every associate serves customers, either external customers or internal customers and often both.

The leadership conferences continue to be held periodically for new associates who have joined the company since the last conference. Each time a conference is held, efforts are made to expand and improve the content. Feedback from attendees provides an excellent source of ideas for improvement.

In 1991, a quality steering committee (QSC) was formed. Seven associates from across the company served as members of the QSC. Their purpose was to study, learn, and help find ways to assist corporate leaders, senior leaders, and other associates in our CIP initiative.

In early 1995, a new phase of our evolving CIP began with the formation of two customer councils. One council was composed of associates from across the company to focus on external customer issues. The other council was composed of associates from across the company to focus on internal customer issues.

In late 1996, a new phase began with the formation of a Learning Systems Council. The purpose of this council was to help find ways to accelerate the transformation of the company into a true learning organization. This initiative focused on the publications of Dr. Peter Senge, including The Fifth Discipline and The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook.

Also in 1996, the concept of a separate sales function with a separate sales staff was abandoned in favor of integrating throughout the company the full responsibility for developing and maintaining relationships with our external customers. This seemingly radical organizational change was made after extensive study of the research and publications of Dr. Leonard Berry of Texas A&M, a world-renowned expert in the unique aspects of the marketing and delivery of services (in particular, professional services) as opposed to the marketing and delivery of goods.

Efforts to fully integrate the ultimate responsibility for building and maintaining customer relationships throughout the entire organization are ongoing. Movement toward convergence and integration of the "promise maker" roles with the "promise keeper" roles has been a very beneficial change that is believed to be especially important in a service business such as ours. And, that convergence and integration are well-aligned with the findings and teachings of Dr. Berry.

Since this change began in 1996, associates throughout the company have had increasing opportunities to actively participate in our new, evolving process of finding new customers and then developing and maintaining strong relationships with those customers. With the opportunities to more actively participate have come new challenges and professional growth. And as a result of that increased participation, a stronger organization has now been built with much more capability to pursue, and then to maintain, the kinds of customer relationships we desire.


Results

Dr. Deming believed that results cannot be fully measured or accurately reflected by the use of "visible figures" alone. We agree. There are many different indicators we use to help us know how we are doing relative to our mission. Some of those indicators involve visible figures, and some do not.

One important indicator we use is the frequency with which we are awarded sole-source, relationship-based, and value-based repeat business by an increasing number of reputable customers at more and more of their locations world-wide. It is high.

Another important indicator we use is the number of new, desirable customers we add each year. Since the beginning of 1997, we have added 53 new customers.


————————————————

Return to Operating Statement